Company research
Company-by-company analysis, with the research and limitations in view.
254 reviews
AI Search Audit is a mixed-to-uncertain fit for mid-market AI search audits. Three of seven platforms named it during ranking discovery (anthropic, grok, perplexity), and fit ratings split across good (google, grok), mixed (openai), and uncertain (anthropic, deepseek, kimi, perplexity).
7 usable AI responses
Helium SEO is a qualified fit for mid-market companies that want a managed AI search audit rather than a self-service dashboard. Its AI Deep Dive Audit covers 250-plus prompts, competitor benchmarking, and a developer-ready roadmap, but pricing and methodology are undisclosed.
7 usable AI responses
Conductor is a strong fit for large enterprises running AI search audits across multiple brands and competitors, with prompt-level visibility, mention and citation tracking, and agent-based reporting. The main limitation is opaque, quote-based pricing and unproven page-level citation-architecture depth.
7 usable AI responses
Peec AI is a good fit for enterprise AI search audits, with a procurement caveat. Three of seven platforms named it during ranking, citing citation architecture analysis and gap analysis. Enterprise pricing and contract terms are not publicly transparent, so buyers should require a written quote and pilot.
7 usable AI responses
iPullRank is a good fit for large enterprises wanting a consulting-led AI search audit spanning technical retrieval, citation architecture, entity analysis, competitor benchmarking, and a prioritized executive roadmap.
7 usable AI responses
Indexable AI is a good fit for a large enterprise that wants a fast, fixed-scope AI search diagnostic with executive-ready output, but it is a conditional fit for multi-brand, multi-market portfolios. The audit price, prompt volume, competitor limits, and multi-brand scope are not published.
7 usable AI responses
BrightEdge is a good fit for large enterprise teams that want AI search auditing embedded in a broader enterprise SEO, analytics, and consulting program, not as a standalone AI-audit tool. Pricing is custom and undisclosed.
7 usable AI responses
Semrush is a good fit for enterprise AI search audits when the buyer needs large-scale prompt research, multi-platform visibility monitoring, competitor benchmarking, citation and source analysis, and executive-ready reporting inside an existing SEO workflow.
7 usable AI responses
Profound is a strong-to-good fit for enterprise AI search audits when buyers have dedicated analysts and custom-priced Enterprise budget. It excels at citation-level competitive diagnostics and executive dashboards, but does not execute content changes and its pricing and multi-brand scope remain unverified.
7 usable AI responses
Peec AI is a partial fit for GEO audit companies: strong daily multi-platform visibility, citation-source, and competitor tracking, but no delivered audit methodology, first-party content audit, or implementation support. Two of seven platforms named it, at an average listed rank of 6.5.
7 usable AI responses
Logarithmic fits U.S. companies wanting a one-time, executive-level GEO diagnostic rather than ongoing monitoring. Its two-week GEO Audit delivers an 18-to-24-page vendor-neutral report with a 30-day action plan, but pricing and contract terms are not public.
7 usable AI responses
Siege Media is a good but not unanimous fit for GEO audit buyers. Two of seven AI platforms named it, with an average listed rank of 5.0. Its integrated GEO audit links citation mapping and share-of-voice benchmarking to content, PR, and authority building, but it is not sold as a standalone fixed-fee product.
7 usable AI responses
