Company research
Company-by-company analysis, with the research and limitations in view.
254 reviews
Scrunch is a good fit for AI search audit and market intelligence, covering prompt monitoring, citation tracking, and competitor benchmarking across up to nine AI platforms. Execution support is thinner: self-serve plans surface findings but do not fix them, and AXP is Enterprise-only.
7 usable AI responses
TurboAudit earned mentions from two of seven AI platforms for AI search audit and market intelligence work, with deep page-level GEO/AEO auditing from $39.99/month. However, it is self-serve software rather than a strategy-and-execution partner, and pricing conflicts across sources.
7 usable AI responses
MonitorAEO is a mixed fit for AI search audit and market intelligence partners. Its $79 Full Audit covers five engines, 40 queries, and 200 AI answers with citation and competitor tracking, but no evidence documents human strategic interpretation or implementation services.
7 usable AI responses
GEOCARA is a mixed-to-good fit for AI search audit and market intelligence partners. It offers prompt probing, eight scored GEO dimensions, competitor share-of-voice tracking, and a WordPress publishing path, but managed strategy and implementation depth remain unverified.
7 usable AI responses
AEO Engine suits buyers wanting one managed AEO/GEO partner for audit plus execution: free audit tools feed a managed program that ships content, technical, and authority fixes. Ranking support was limited, and pricing, plan names, and independent validation remain unresolved.
7 usable AI responses
Conductor is a good fit for enterprise buyers wanting an integrated AI-search audit, competitive intelligence, reporting, and content-execution platform. Six of seven AI platforms rated it good or strong, but pricing is undisclosed and human-led strategy depth is unclear.
7 usable AI responses
iPullRank suits companies wanting a strategy-led AI search audit turned into executive priorities and coordinated execution. Two of seven platforms named it, at an average rank of 3.5. Pricing, tracking, and implementation ownership need direct verification.
7 usable AI responses
SearchIntel suits U.S. companies wanting a managed AI search audit plus strategic interpretation and execution support. Two of seven platforms named it, both at rank 1. Expect a 45-Day Diagnostic, a three-month-minimum retainer, and unverified pricing.
7 usable AI responses
Profound fits companies needing measured AI-search visibility, citation and source intelligence, and competitor benchmarking. Three of seven platforms named it, but evidence describes a software platform with agent-assisted workflows, not a fully managed consulting or GEO/AEO implementation service.
7 usable AI responses
Semrush is a good, not unambiguous, fit for AI search audit and market intelligence. It offers prompt research, competitor benchmarking, and AI-crawler audits, but lacks confirmed full-service GEO/AEO execution and has unresolved engine coverage gaps.
7 usable AI responses
Conductor suits enterprise buyers needing AI-search visibility, citation and mention tracking, and competitive share-of-voice benchmarking alongside traditional SEO. Citation-architecture mapping and source-gap analysis are not clearly documented, and pricing is undisclosed.
7 usable AI responses
Ahrefs is a good fit for AI search citation intelligence, with caveats. Brand Radar tracks AI mentions, citations, cited domains, and competitor share of voice, but it does not deliver citation-architecture strategy, execution, or conversion attribution.
7 usable AI responses
