Company research
Company-by-company analysis, with the research and limitations in view.
254 reviews
White Label IQ is a good fit for agencies that want a managed, white-label AI visibility audit delivered under their own brand, but the fit is not clean. Four of seven platforms named it during ranking discovery, at an average listed rank of 7.5 and a best rank of 5 (openai, anthropic, kimi, perplexity).
7 usable AI responses
Scrunch AI is a good fit for the measurement half of a pre-GEO-agency audit, documenting prompt-level visibility, citations, and competitor presence as a baseline. It is a monitoring subscription, not an independent consulting audit, and plan names and pricing conflict across sources.
7 usable AI responses
Otterly.AI is a good fit for documenting an AI search baseline before hiring a GEO agency. It tracks brand mentions, citations, sentiment, share of voice, and competitor gaps across major AI engines, with exportable reports. It audits but does not execute strategy.
7 usable AI responses
Peec AI is a strong fit for most buyers who need a documented AI-search baseline before hiring a GEO agency, but the consensus is not unanimous. Two of seven platforms named Peec AI during the ranking stage (deepseek, openai), and five of seven rated it a strong or good fit for this use case.
7 usable AI responses
Ahrefs is a good fit for a documented AI search baseline before hiring a GEO agency, but not a complete audit solution. Brand Radar covers AI mentions, citations, share of voice, and competitor benchmarking, though pricing and platform coverage conflict across sources.
7 usable AI responses
AI Search Optimization Agency fits buyers who want a low-cost, one-time AI search baseline before signing a GEO agency contract. Its $290 Pro Audit is company-reported to test 30 prompts across five or six AI engines, but no independent source validates its methodology or repeatability.
7 usable AI responses
Semrush is a good fit for documenting an AI search baseline before hiring a GEO agency, per six of seven platforms. Its AI Visibility Toolkit covers prompt tracking, competitor benchmarking, citations, and AI-readiness audits, but it is a measurement tool, not a full audit deliverable.
7 usable AI responses
Profound is a good fit for companies that need a documented, multi-engine baseline of AI search visibility before signing a GEO agency contract. Two of the seven platforms in this study named Profound during the ranking stage, and both placed it in the top three (average listed rank 2.0; best rank 1).
7 usable AI responses
Maxeemize AI Search Visibility Audit is a weak-to-uncertain fit for companies losing Google traffic. Only 2 of 7 platforms named it during ranking discovery, and fit ratings split across the panel. Pricing, deliverables, and independent outcomes are not publicly verified.
7 usable AI responses
SEOptimer is a mixed fit for AI search audits. Its low-cost GEO Audit bundles AI-readiness checks with a 100+ point SEO audit, but no supplied evidence verifies continuous multi-platform citation tracking or Google Search Console traffic-loss diagnosis.
7 usable AI responses
Omnius is a mixed-to-good fit for companies losing Google traffic that want an agency-led AI search audit. Its stated scope covers multi-LLM prompt testing, citations, competitor benchmarking, crawler access, and a prioritized GEO roadmap, but no official price or standalone audit definition is published.
7 usable AI responses
Veza Digital's AI Search Visibility Audit is a $4,500 fixed-price diagnostic with 30 days of tracking across six AI platforms, competitor benchmarking, and a 90-day action plan. It maps AI citations and GEO gaps, but public methodology is undisclosed and it is not a forensic Google traffic-loss investigation.
7 usable AI responses
