Company research
Company-by-company analysis, with the research and limitations in view.
230 reviews
Citable Agency fits buyers who need a fixed-fee diagnosis of how AI systems cite their brand, plus a prioritized roadmap. Audits run €1,800 to €5,400, but implementation, monitoring, and citation guarantees sit outside the fee.
7 usable AI responses
Opositive is a good fit for buyers wanting a managed AI citation architecture retainer: citation audits, competitor citation mapping, source prospecting, entity/Wikidata work, and cross-model tracking. Pricing, contract terms, and independent outcome validation were not found.
7 usable AI responses
The 66th is a qualified but not conclusively proven fit for companies buying AI citation architecture services. Two of seven platforms named it during the ranking stage, and those two placed it at rank 2, giving it an average listed rank of 2.0 and a best listed rank of 2.
7 usable AI responses
Enleaf is a qualified but not unanimous fit for AI citation architecture agencies. Two of seven AI platforms named it in ranking, and its AI SEO service covers source mapping, entity work, and monthly AI visibility checks, but pricing and outcome evidence remain unverified.
7 usable AI responses
Citevora is a good fit for U.S. companies seeking specialized AI citation-architecture research with optional ongoing execution. Three of seven platforms named it during ranking, at an average rank of 1.33.
7 usable AI responses
CiteWorks Studio is a good fit for agency-led AI citation architecture, named by four of seven platforms at an average rank of 1.25. Its scope covers source mapping, competitor benchmarking, and AI-search measurement, but pricing and independently verified outcomes are not publicly established.
7 usable AI responses
iPullRank is a strong fit for enterprise and upper-mid-market companies that want AI Search authority treated as an ongoing operating model.
7 usable AI responses
Citevora is a reasonable fit for U.S. companies seeking a specialist AI search authority building agency, with meaningful verification requirements. Two of seven platforms named it during ranking, and it finished fourth overall with an average listed rank of 3.5.
7 usable AI responses
GenOptima is a qualified fit for AI search authority building agencies, named by two of seven platforms at rank 2. Its RaaS model and GENO monitoring suit multi-platform GEO, but pricing and contract terms remain undisclosed.
7 usable AI responses
Go Fish Digital is a strong-to-good fit for U.S. enterprise and mid-market companies that want one agency to combine first-party content, semantic site architecture, technical SEO, digital PR, and AI-visibility measurement.
7 usable AI responses
First Page Sage suits companies wanting AI search authority built through expert-authored content, SEO, GEO/AEO, PR, and third-party corroboration under one retainer. Five of seven platforms named it, but pricing, contract terms, and multi-platform citation measurement are not publicly documented.
7 usable AI responses
iPullRank is a qualified but not unanimous fit for AI citation building agencies, named by two of five platforms at an average rank of 6.0. Its Relevance Engineering and GEO measurement work are strengths, but no standardized citation-placement package or verified pricing was found.
5 usable AI responses
