Answer Capsule
Ahrefs is a good-to-strong fit for AI Brand Visibility Tracking Tools, especially for brands already using Ahrefs for SEO. Three of seven platforms named Ahrefs during the ranking stage (openai, deepseek, perplexity), and six of seven returned a usable fit assessment. The strongest reason to consider it is Ahrefs Brand Radar, which tracks mentions, citations, cited pages, estimated impressions, and AI share of voice across major public AI answer engines, with prompts derived from real search behavior [1]. The main limitation is cost and coverage ambiguity: premium AI index bundles run $199–$699/month on top of a base plan, and public sources conflict on whether Brand Radar is free, standalone, or an add-on [3].
Research Snapshot
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Platform mentions in ranking stage | 3 of 7 platforms (openai, deepseek, perplexity) |
| Share of included platform responses | 42.9% |
| Average listed rank | 3.0 |
| Best listed rank | 2 (openai) |
| Relevant product/model/plan | Ahrefs Brand Radar, especially Brand Radar All Platforms and Custom Prompts |
| Overall use-case fit | Good to strong; strongest for existing Ahrefs users |
| Research date | 2026-09-19 |
Why Ahrefs Qualified for This Study
Questions This Section Answers
- Is Ahrefs a good choice for AI Brand Visibility Tracking Tools in 2026?
- How many AI platforms named Ahrefs as an AI brand visibility tracking tool?
Ahrefs qualified because three of seven included platforms named it during ranking discovery, and six of seven returned a usable fit assessment. The three naming platforms were openai, deepseek, and perplexity, with listed ranks of 2, 4, and 3 respectively. Ahrefs' average listed rank was 3.0, and its best listed rank was 2 (openai).
The entity was assessed as a company, with Ahrefs Brand Radar as the relevant product. Fit ratings varied by platform: openai rated it "strong," anthropic, deepseek, and perplexity rated it "good," grok rated it "mixed," and kimi rated it "uncertain." One platform (google) did not return a usable fit assessment, so the fit findings are not unanimous.
The deterministic identity audit noted that official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions and that identity matching used an exact-name fallback with a reported domain that remains unverified. Buyers should treat the Ahrefs/ahrefs.com identity as requiring ordinary buyer-side verification.
The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to AI Brand Visibility Tracking Tools
Questions This Section Answers
- Which Ahrefs product should a buyer use for AI brand visibility tracking?
- Does Ahrefs Brand Radar require a base Ahrefs subscription or can it be bought standalone?
The relevant product is Ahrefs Brand Radar, particularly Brand Radar All Platforms and Custom Prompts [6]. Brand Radar is positioned as an AI visibility product that shows how any brand appears in AI search across a large index of search-backed prompts [11].
Public sources conflict on packaging. Ahrefs' own FAQ states Brand Radar can be sold standalone from $50/month with custom prompt functionality and no Ahrefs subscription required [13]. Other Ahrefs pages and third-party reviews describe Brand Radar as an add-on to a base Ahrefs plan, with premium AI index bundles at $199/month per platform or $699/month for all platforms [14]. One independent review states Brand Radar platform access can be purchased as a standalone product, so a separate base Ahrefs SEO plan is not always required [18].
Because these packaging claims conflict, buyers should confirm in their own account and checkout whether the quoted plan includes the AI Visibility Index, Custom Prompts, or both.
What the AI Platforms Agreed About
Questions This Section Answers
- What do AI platforms agree Ahrefs Brand Radar does well for AI visibility tracking?
- Does Ahrefs Brand Radar track mentions, citations, and share of voice across AI answer engines?
Platforms broadly agreed that Brand Radar tracks brand mentions, citations, and AI share of voice across major public AI answer engines. Ahrefs states AI Share of Voice is calculated from mentions and citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode [19]. Independent reviews describe the primary AI metrics as mentions, citations, estimated impressions, and AI Share of Voice [20].
Platforms also agreed that Brand Radar derives prompts from real search behavior rather than synthetic questions. Ahrefs states prompts come from real Google keywords expanded into natural questions [21]. One independent review describes Brand Radar as tracking brand visibility across 405+ million search-backed prompts modeled after real keywords [22].
A third area of agreement was citation-source visibility. Independent reviews state Brand Radar shows which URL an AI model pulled a mention from, so buyers can see whether the win came from their own site, a Reddit thread, a review roundup, or a competitor's blog [23]. Ahrefs documentation distinguishes cited sources from pages found but not cited [24].
Platforms also agreed on integration with SEO workflows. One independent review describes Brand Radar as bridging SEO, AEO, and AI visibility in one dashboard [25]. Another notes users can cross-reference Brand Radar mentions with backlink data [26].
Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain
Questions This Section Answers
- Is Ahrefs Brand Radar free in paid Ahrefs plans, or does full AI visibility tracking require paid add-ons?
- Which AI platforms does Ahrefs Brand Radar cover, and does it include Claude, Meta AI, or DeepSeek?
Platforms disagreed on pricing and packaging. Anthropic reported that Brand Radar was included in all paid Ahrefs plans at no extra cost during beta, even on the entry-level Lite plan [27]. Perplexity reported conflicting Ahrefs pages showing Brand Radar at $199/month per index and $699/month for all platforms, while Ahrefs' FAQ also says standalone Brand Radar starts at $50/month [29]. Grok reported a typical all-in cost of $828+/month for full coverage [32]. OpenAI reported Brand Radar individual-platform access at $199/month and All Platforms at $699/month including 2,500 custom-prompt checks [33].
Platforms also disagreed on platform coverage. Anthropic reported Brand Radar tracks seven AI systems: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity, and Grok [34]. The same source noted that Claude, Meta AI, and DeepSeek are absent from the core bundle [35]. OpenAI reported Grok data collection is currently unavailable for new Custom Prompt data because of a policy change [37]. Kimi reported no verified evidence that Ahrefs offers AI answer-engine monitoring at all, describing the fit as uncertain [38]. This is a material conflict that buyers should resolve directly with Ahrefs.
Platforms also disagreed on accuracy and refresh cadence. Grok cited independent tests noting underreporting (for example, 3 versus 123 ChatGPT mentions in one audit) and monthly refreshes on some surfaces [32]. OpenAI reported daily, weekly, or monthly refresh schedules for Custom Prompts [37]. Ahrefs states each prompt is checked daily on every selected platform [40].
Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities
Questions This Section Answers
- Does Ahrefs Brand Radar track prompt coverage, citations, and visibility changes over time?
- Can Ahrefs Brand Radar monitor custom buyer prompts across multiple AI assistants?
Brand Radar's core capabilities map to the use case of tracking mentions, recommendations, citations, prompt coverage, and changes in brand visibility over time.
Mentions and recommendations. Brand Radar reports whether a brand appears in an AI-generated response and supports competitive benchmarking [41]. OpenAI noted the public documentation does not establish that every recommendation is separately classified from ordinary brand mentions [41].
Citations and source influence. Brand Radar measures cited pages and domains, distinguishes cited sources from pages found but not cited, and exposes AI responses and citation-related reports [42]. Independent reviews confirm the tool shows which URL the model pulled a mention from [43].
Prompt coverage. Custom Prompts allow buyer-defined questions, selected AI assistants, locations, and daily, weekly, or monthly refresh schedules [44]. Ahrefs positions this as focused monitoring of high-priority questions rather than exhaustive monitoring of every possible prompt [41]. Custom prompts are described as free on Lite and higher plans, with paid volume starting at $50/month for 2,500 checks [45].
Visibility changes over time. Brand Radar provides historical trends and date filtering for AI visibility analysis [41]. One independent review notes YouTube data goes back only to December 2023 [46].
Workflow and reporting. Brand Radar data can be used through Ahrefs reports, Report Builder, API, MCP, and a Looker Studio connector where supported [41]. One independent review notes exports were upgraded to support direct Google Sheets export and CSV download [47].
Topic clustering. Brand Radar added a Topics report and Overview widget, grouping queries by parent topics from Keywords Explorer [48].
Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs
Questions This Section Answers
- How much does Ahrefs Brand Radar cost per month, and are there setup or cancellation fees?
- What overage charges apply to Ahrefs custom prompt checks?
Pricing is the least consistent part of the public record. Ahrefs' pricing page reports Brand Radar AI starting at $199/month for an individual platform and $699/month for All Platforms, with All Platforms including 2,500 custom-prompt checks per month [49]. Ahrefs' FAQ also states standalone Brand Radar can start at $50/month with custom prompt functionality and no Ahrefs subscription required [51].
Custom-prompt packages are listed at $50/month for 2,500 checks, $100/month for 7,000 checks, and $250/month for 25,000 checks, with stated overage rates of $0.020, $0.015, and $0.010 per check respectively [49]. One independent review states Claude tracking consumes 8 checks per update versus 1 for other platforms [52].
Base Ahrefs plans are reported at $29/month (Starter), $129/month (Lite), $249/month (Standard), $449/month (Advanced), and $1,499+/month (Enterprise) [53]. One independent review states there is no free trial on Ahrefs in 2026 [53].
Contract terms: Ahrefs states Brand Radar is generally monthly, while Enterprise users may buy annually [49]. One Ahrefs blog says Brand Radar can only be purchased monthly, with annual purchase available only for Enterprise users [55]. Ahrefs states subscriptions can be canceled from account settings and remain usable through the paid subscription period, and generally does not issue refunds, though monthly refunds may be requested if the service has not been used, subject to Ahrefs' discretion [49].
Additional fees reported include overage charges after included custom-prompt checks are consumed, additional Ahrefs users, API usage, exports, and plan-specific usage [49]. One independent review reports extra user seats at $40–$100/month per seat depending on plan tier [54].
Pricing confidence is moderate to low across platforms. Public Ahrefs pages show conflicting currency and price presentations, including $199/$699 and €179/€654, so U.S. checkout pricing should be verified before purchase [49].
Best Suited For
Questions This Section Answers
- Who is Ahrefs Brand Radar best suited for in AI brand visibility tracking?
- Is Ahrefs Brand Radar a good fit for agencies managing multiple client brands?
Ahrefs Brand Radar is best suited for brands comparing AI share of voice and recommendations across major public AI-search platforms [56]. It fits SEO, content, and communications teams that need cited-page and cited-domain analysis tied to AI answers [57]. It also fits teams wanting both large-scale prompt discovery and a smaller set of monitored buyer prompts [56].
Existing Ahrefs customers are the strongest fit. One independent review describes Brand Radar's most attractive feature as its inclusion across all Ahrefs subscription plans at no extra cost during beta, accessible even on the entry-level Lite plan [59]. Another describes it as best for existing Ahrefs ecosystem users, SMBs, and agencies needing directional AI visibility without standalone vendor commitment [59].
Agencies managing multiple client brands within one Ahrefs account with aligned SEO and AEO goals are also a fit [59]. One independent review notes Brand Radar is embedded within the Ahrefs platform, integrating AI visibility with SEO data such as backlinks, keywords, and rankings [60].
Probably Not Best Suited For
Questions This Section Answers
- Who should not choose Ahrefs Brand Radar for AI brand visibility tracking?
- Is Ahrefs Brand Radar a poor fit for buyers who need sentiment analysis or emerging AI platform coverage?
Buyers requiring complete coverage of every AI assistant, private or logged-in experience, or user-personalized responses are not a good fit [61]. Ahrefs states prompts are queried without stored user data, prior context, personalization, pre-prompting, or filtering, which improves repeatability but may not represent logged-in or personalized user experiences [61].
Buyers seeking only inexpensive custom-prompt monitoring without Ahrefs' broader AI visibility dataset are also not a good fit [61]. One independent review notes Brand Radar can be expensive for a smaller team that only wants to monitor a limited prompt set across several AI engines [62].
Organizations requiring independently audited measurement of AI visibility or verified causal attribution to sales are not a good fit [61]. One independent review states Brand Radar does not prove how many real users saw an answer, whether the mention caused traffic or revenue, or whether one optimization directly produced the change [63].
Teams requiring sentiment analysis are not a good fit. One independent review states Brand Radar is missing sentiment analysis of how a brand is perceived in AI search [64]. Brands needing tracking across specialized or emerging AI platforms such as Claude, Meta AI, or DeepSeek are also not a good fit, since those are absent from the core bundle [65].
When Another Option May Be Better
Questions This Section Answers
- What is a better alternative to Ahrefs Brand Radar for buyers who need sentiment analysis or emerging AI platform coverage?
- When is a dedicated AI visibility tool a better choice than Ahrefs Brand Radar?
Another option may be better in several situations. Buyers requiring sentiment analysis of how their brand is perceived in AI-generated responses should consider Profound, which one independent review cites as offering sentiment tracking that Brand Radar does not [67]. Buyers needing monitoring across emerging or specialized AI platforms such as Claude, Meta AI, or DeepSeek should consider Profound, which one independent review cites as covering a broader platform range [68].
Buyers not already using Ahrefs and wanting a standalone AI visibility tool without committing to the Ahrefs ecosystem may prefer a specialist, since the base Ahrefs cost may be unnecessary if only AI tracking is needed [69]. Buyers requiring AI shopping analysis or product-level visibility in AI-generated shopping recommendations should consider Profound, which one independent review cites as offering a shopping module [67].
Buyers needing high-volume custom prompt tracking at a fixed price may find Ahrefs' overage model expensive at scale compared to some competitors [70]. Small single-brand teams with only 50–100 custom prompts to monitor may find Ahrefs Lite overkill relative to lightweight specialists such as Peec.ai or Otterly.ai [71]. Buyers needing real-time or near-real-time monitoring should note Brand Radar operates on scheduled snapshot intervals, not continuous tracking [72].
Kimi reported that dedicated AI visibility tools such as Astiva AI, SE Visible, Viali, Trakkr, Mentionlytics, withMaya, and Citare explicitly list 5–10 AI platforms, and that Ahrefs was absent from that landscape in its search results [73]. This is a platform-reported finding that conflicts with other platforms' evidence and should be treated as unverified.
Questions to Verify Before Buying
Questions This Section Answers
- What should a buyer confirm with Ahrefs before signing a contract for Brand Radar?
- Which AI platforms, indexes, and locations are included in the quoted Ahrefs Brand Radar plan?
Buyers should confirm the following before purchase, based on the questions raised across platform responses [80]:
- Which exact AI platforms, indexes, countries, languages, and locations are included in the quoted All Platforms purchase?
- Does the quoted plan include the AI Visibility Index, Custom Prompts, or both?
- Is Brand Radar still free within the base Ahrefs subscription as of the purchase date, or has post-beta paid pricing been implemented?
- Are recommendations, rankings, and preference statements separately classified, or counted only as brand mentions within responses?
- What historical depth is available for the selected indexes and custom prompts?
- How are prompt checks consumed when multiple platforms, locations, refresh frequencies, or assistants are selected?
- What are the current U.S. checkout prices, taxes, annual options, overage rates, refund rules, and cancellation effects?
- Can the API, MCP, Report Builder, and Looker Studio features export all required mention, citation, prompt, and trend fields?
- How often are each platform's indexes refreshed, and what happens when an assistant changes its interface, policies, or response behavior?
- Does Brand Radar include monitoring for emerging AI platforms beyond the current set, such as Claude, Meta AI, or DeepSeek?
- Is Ahrefs Brand Radar available for the buyer's geography, and is there regional pricing or feature parity?
- Does Ahrefs offer a free trial or pilot for new subscribers, or is a paid plan the minimum entry point?
Final AI Consensus Verdict
Ahrefs is a good-to-strong fit for AI Brand Visibility Tracking Tools, with the strongest support coming from openai ("strong") and good ratings from anthropic, deepseek, and perplexity. Grok rated it "mixed," and kimi rated it "uncertain," citing no verified evidence of AI answer-engine monitoring. The fit findings are not unanimous, and one platform (google) did not return a usable assessment.
The strongest reason to consider Ahrefs is Brand Radar's combination of large-scale search-backed prompt discovery, exact buyer-prompt tracking, citation and cited-page analysis, competitor benchmarking, and historical trend analysis, all integrated with Ahrefs' SEO data [83]. For existing Ahrefs users, the reported inclusion of Brand Radar in paid plans during beta is a meaningful cost advantage [86].
The main limitations are cost and coverage ambiguity. Premium AI index bundles run $199–$699/month on top of a base plan, public sources conflict on whether Brand Radar is free, standalone, or an add-on, and the core bundle does not cover Claude, Meta AI, or DeepSeek [87]. Brand Radar also lacks sentiment analysis and does not prove causal business impact [90]. Buyers should verify current pricing, plan entitlements, platform coverage, and refresh cadence directly with Ahrefs before purchasing.
How This Review Was Produced
This review was produced from platform-reported research collected on 2026-09-19. Seven platforms were configured for the study, and six returned a usable fit assessment. Three platforms named Ahrefs during ranking discovery: openai, deepseek, and perplexity. The entity was assessed as a company, with Ahrefs Brand Radar as the relevant product for AI Brand Visibility Tracking Tools.
Platform fit ratings were: openai "strong," anthropic "good," deepseek "good," perplexity "good," grok "mixed," and kimi "uncertain." Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations, so company claims should not be described as independently verified. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
Methodology Limitations
Several limitations apply. First, six of seven included platforms returned a usable fit assessment, so the fit findings are not unanimous. Second, platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date: deepseek reported 2026-01-15, while other platforms reported 2026-09-19. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.
Third, the deterministic identity audit noted that official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions and that identity matching used an exact-name fallback with a reported domain that remains unverified. Fourth, public sources conflict on pricing, packaging, and platform coverage, and these conflicts were not resolved by guessing. Fifth, kimi reported no verified evidence that Ahrefs offers AI answer-engine monitoring, which conflicts with the other platforms' evidence; this is a platform-reported finding that should be treated as unverified.
Sixth, company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations, so company claims are not independently verified. Seventh, no-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts. Eighth, the reviewed pages report changing index sizes, including approximately 405M, 455M, and 459M prompts, so the exact current count depends on the page, index, and update timing [92].
Explore more ai visibility llm monitoring guidance in the category directory.
Sources
Company-Owned Sources
- Overview - Ahrefs: https://ahrefs.com/academy/how-to-use-brand-radar/overview
- Free AI Overviews Tracker by Ahrefs: Track Your Brand in AI Overviews: https://ahrefs.com/ai-overviews-tracker
- Free AI Visibility Checker by Ahrefs: Track Your Brand in AI search: https://ahrefs.com/ai-visibility-checker
- Ahrefs Pricing: How to Choose the Right Ahrefs Plan: https://ahrefs.com/blog/ahrefs-pricing/
- Ahrefs Brand Radar Methodology: How we collect and model AI visibility data: https://ahrefs.com/blog/brand-radar-methodology/
- How to Choose the Best Prompts to Monitor Your AI Search Visibility: https://ahrefs.com/blog/custom-prompt-tracking/
- The conference for marketers ready to win in 2026: https://ahrefs.com/blog/new-features
- Brand Radar: See ANY brand’s AI visibility: https://ahrefs.com/brand-radar
- Ahrefs FAQ | Frequently asked questions: https://ahrefs.com/faq
- Ahrefs Brand Radar Features: https://ahrefs.com/features/brand-radar
- Plans & Pricing - Ahrefs: https://ahrefs.com/pricing
- Astiva AI Product: Detect, Diagnose, Displace, Prove AI Visibility: https://astiva.ai/product
- About Brand Radar | Help Center - Ahrefs: https://help.ahrefs.com/en/articles/11064852-about-brand-radar
- What is Brand Radar, and how to use it?: https://help.ahrefs.com/en/articles/11064852-what-is-brand-radar-and-how-to-use-it
- How to set up custom prompts to track brand visibility in AI assistants: https://help.ahrefs.com/en/articles/13192745-how-to-set-up-custom-prompts-to-track-brand-visibility-in-ai-assistants
- AI Visibility Metrics: https://help.ahrefs.com/en/articles/15501968-ai-visibility-metrics
- Trakkr | AI Visibility Platform for Brands & Agencies: https://trakkr.ai/
- Visibility Tracker — See Every AI Answer | Viali: https://viali.ai/product/visibility-tracking/
- SE Visible — An AI Visibility Tool Made to Empower Brands: https://visible.seranking.com/
- Track your brand across every AI platform: https://withmaya.ai/product/ai-visibility-tracking
- Brand Radar — AI search visibility monitoring across 5 platforms | Citare: https://www.citare.ai/brand-radar
- AI Brand Visibility Tool - See What AI Says About You: https://www.mentionlytics.com/product/ai-visibility/
Additional AI research evidence94 records
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:23-7
- AI research evidence record perplexity:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record openai:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:22-12
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record grok:web:2
- AI research evidence record perplexity:3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:33-5
- AI research evidence record grok:web:10
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record perplexity:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
- AI research evidence record perplexity:8
- AI research evidence record anthropic:4-4
- AI research evidence record perplexity:13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:4-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:23-7
- AI research evidence record anthropic:33-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:6-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-10
- AI research evidence record anthropic:7-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record anthropic:22-12
- AI research evidence record perplexity:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:2
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record grok:web:0
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:20-9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:20-11
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record kimi:citare-ai-1
- AI research evidence record grok:web:5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:22-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:6-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-4
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record anthropic:9-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:15-16
- AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
- AI research evidence record perplexity:4
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record anthropic:7-5
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:4-10
- AI research evidence record anthropic:4-14
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:20-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:20-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:6-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:22-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:astiva-ai-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:se-visible-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:viali-ai-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:trakkr-ai-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:mentionlytics-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:withmaya-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:citare-ai-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-10
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record perplexity:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:4-14
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:33-5
- AI research evidence record grok:web:2
Independent Sources
- Ahrefs Pricing 2026: $29–$449/mo (Every Plan Compared: https://clarorank.com/ahrefs-pricing/
- Ahrefs Brand Radar Review 2026: Features, Pricing, and Who It's Really For: https://dageno.ai/blog/ahrefs-brand-radar-review
- Ahrefs Cost Breakdown & Alternatives 2026: https://maintouch.com/blogs/ahrefs-pricing
- Best AI Mode Rank Trackers for 2026: https://metehan.ai/articles/best-ai-mode-rank-tracker/
- Ahrefs Brand Radar Review 2026: Is It Worth $828/Month?: https://nboundmarketing.com/research/ai-visibility/ahrefs-brand-radar/
- All 35 Ahrefs Features Tested: What's Worth It in 2026: https://searchatlas.com/blog/ahrefs-features/
- Ahrefs Pricing 2026: Plans Start at $29/Month | TMB: https://thatmarketingbuddy.com/pricing/ahrefs
- Ahrefs for AI Visibility: Brand Radar Review & What It Still Can't Track (2026: https://www.ekamoira.com/blog/ahrefs-for-ai-visibility-brand-radar-review-what-it-still-can-t-track-2026
- Ahrefs Brand Radar Alternatives & Review: Is It Worth It? (2026: https://www.ewrdigital.com/blog/ahrefs-brand-radar-review-alternatives-pricing-comparison
- Ahrefs Brand Radar Review 2026: Features, Pricing, Verdict: https://www.layer3labs.io/guides/ahrefs-brand-radar-review
- Ahrefs Brand Radar review for agencies (2026): worth it for client AI visibility?: https://www.rankability.com/blog/ahrefs-brand-radar-review/
- Ahrefs vs Profound (2026) — Which AI Tracking Tool is Better?: https://www.stylefactoryproductions.com/blog/ahrefs-vs-profound
- Ahrefs Brand Radar: AI Visibility Guide For 2026: https://www.successtechservices.com/ahrefs-brand-radar/
- Ahrefs Brand Radar Review 2026: Is It Worth $828? - Analyze AI: https://www.tryanalyze.ai/blog/ahrefs-brand-radar-review
- Ahrefs Brand Radar Review (2026): Good for SEO Teams, Not Enough for AEO: https://www.tryprofound.com/blog/ahrefs-brand-radar-review
Additional AI research evidence94 records
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:23-7
- AI research evidence record perplexity:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record openai:c5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:22-12
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record grok:web:2
- AI research evidence record perplexity:3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:33-5
- AI research evidence record grok:web:10
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record perplexity:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
- AI research evidence record perplexity:8
- AI research evidence record anthropic:4-4
- AI research evidence record perplexity:13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:4-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:23-7
- AI research evidence record anthropic:33-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:6-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-10
- AI research evidence record anthropic:7-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record anthropic:22-12
- AI research evidence record perplexity:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:2
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record grok:web:0
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:20-9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:20-11
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record kimi:citare-ai-1
- AI research evidence record grok:web:5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:22-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:6-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-4
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record anthropic:9-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:15-16
- AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
- AI research evidence record perplexity:4
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record openai:c4
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record anthropic:7-5
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:4-10
- AI research evidence record anthropic:4-14
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:20-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:20-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:6-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:22-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:astiva-ai-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:se-visible-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:viali-ai-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:trakkr-ai-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:mentionlytics-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:withmaya-1
- AI research evidence record kimi:citare-ai-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-10
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-6
- AI research evidence record perplexity:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:14
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-13
- AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:4-14
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:33-5
- AI research evidence record grok:web:2
Verify this research
Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.
- Study date
- September 19, 2026
- Platforms analyzed
- 7
- Source records
- 37
- Ranking mentions
- 3 of 7
- Platform share
- 43%
- Final consensus rank
- #5
Research trail and source mix
Configured platforms
openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google
Source mix
15 independent · 22 company-owned
Evidence support
34 direct · 3 partial
Important limitation
Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.
Source snapshot SHA-256 9186ad956d2d238ac6cc6a3d0fcd3f5dc4e9bda1c0ceb368822ed0d456e8f5c7