{"citations":{"source_mix":{"company_owned":24,"independent":17,"unclear":0},"sources_referenced_by_questions":0,"support_mix":{"direct":37,"partial":4},"total_sources":41,"unique_domain_count":23},"claims":[{"claim_id":"claim-001","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-19","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"platforms_analyzed","qualifier":"valid included platform responses","subject":"Best AI Visibility Platforms for Historical Trend Tracking","unit":"platforms","value":7},{"claim_id":"claim-002","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-19","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","grok","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"final_consensus_rank","qualifier":"AI Visibility Platforms for Historical Trend Tracking","subject":"OtterlyAI","unit":"rank","value":4},{"claim_id":"claim-003","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-19","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","grok","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"platform_mentions","qualifier":"out of 7","subject":"OtterlyAI","unit":"platforms","value":5},{"claim_id":"claim-004","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-19","platform_support":["google"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"strong","subject":"OtterlyAI","unit":"platforms","value":1},{"claim_id":"claim-005","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-19","platform_support":["anthropic","grok"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"good","subject":"OtterlyAI","unit":"platforms","value":2},{"claim_id":"claim-006","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-19","platform_support":["openai","deepseek","perplexity"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"mixed","subject":"OtterlyAI","unit":"platforms","value":3},{"claim_id":"claim-007","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-19","platform_support":["kimi"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"uncertain","subject":"OtterlyAI","unit":"platforms","value":1}],"content_scope":"aggregated facts, computed metrics, and retrieval summaries","entities":[{"average_rank":5.8,"best_rank":5,"entity_id":"entity-001","entity_type":"company","final_rank":4,"name":"OtterlyAI","platform_mentions":5,"platform_share":0.7142857142857143}],"identity":{"dataset_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/datasets/ai-visibility-llm-monitoring/historical-trend-tracking/otterlyai.json","page_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/ai-visibility-llm-monitoring/historical-trend-tracking/otterlyai","report_type":"fit_review","study_id":"AIMCI-STUDY-48E5CC06976C","title":"OtterlyAI for AI Visibility Platforms for Historical Trend Tracking: AI Consensus Fit Review"},"limitations":["Use the run researchdate as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.","All included platforms evaluated fit, but platformmentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.","Do not resolve conflicting product names, pricing, or capabilities by guessing; describe the conflict and tell buyers what to verify.","The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.","Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations; do not describe company claims as independently verified.","Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date; disclose this as a methodology limitation.","Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts."],"methodology":{"fit_rating_contract":["strong","good","mixed","weak","uncertain"],"included_valid_platform_count":7,"maximum_finalists":10,"minimum_mentions":2,"name":"AI Marketing Consensus Index cross-platform AI consensus analysis","platforms_included":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"platforms_queried":["openai","anthropic","deepseek","grok","perplexity","kimi","google"],"stages":["ranking_discovery","fit_assessment","normalization","editorial_synthesis"],"version":"alias-table-1"},"provenance":{"generated_at":"2026-09-19 14:04:10.222673+00","research_date":"2026-09-19","source_snapshot_sha256":"5a5d2ed7d5afd444937a0448a0190efdebc75a3aa3c347ea166129d8bafaecbe","verification_scope":"public_verification"},"ranking":{"candidates_evaluated":35,"qualified_finalists":8,"ranking_unit":"Software platform or research platform"},"schema_version":4,"summary":"OtterlyAI is a mixed-to-good fit for AI Visibility Platforms for Historical Trend Tracking, depending on how a buyer defines \"historical.\" Five of seven platforms named OtterlyAI during ranking discovery, and its fit ratings ranged from \"strong\" (Google) to \"uncertain\" (Kimi), with OpenAI, Perplexity, and DeepSeek calling it mixed and Anthropic and Grok calling it good. The strongest reason to consider it is prospective, prompt-level daily monitoring with stored answers, citation tracking, competitor benchmarking, and trend charts across multiple AI engines. The main limitation is that…","target_buyer":"Companies seeking AI Visibility Platforms for Historical Trend Tracking across AI search, generative-answer, and recommendation platforms","topic":{"base_category":"AI visibility and LLM monitoring platforms","category_criteria":["Historical recommendation data","citation trends","competitor movement","prompt-level changes","platform differences","and reliable snapshots that are not overwritten by newer results"],"geography":"United States","slug":"best-ai-visibility-platforms-for-historical-trend-tracking","title":"Best AI Visibility Platforms for Historical Trend Tracking","use_case":"AI Visibility Platforms for Historical Trend Tracking"}}