{"citations":{"source_mix":{"company_owned":19,"independent":6,"unclear":0},"sources_referenced_by_questions":0,"support_mix":{"direct":18,"partial":7},"total_sources":25,"unique_domain_count":13},"claims":[{"claim_id":"claim-001","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-18","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"platforms_analyzed","qualifier":"valid included platform responses","subject":"Best AI Search Audit Services for Executive and Board Reporting","unit":"platforms","value":7},{"claim_id":"claim-002","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-18","platform_support":["grok","perplexity"],"predicate":"final_consensus_rank","qualifier":"AI Search Audit Services for Executive and Board Reporting","subject":"Audits.com","unit":"rank","value":6},{"claim_id":"claim-003","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-18","platform_support":["grok","perplexity"],"predicate":"platform_mentions","qualifier":"out of 7","subject":"Audits.com","unit":"platforms","value":2},{"claim_id":"claim-004","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-18","platform_support":["grok","google"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"strong","subject":"Audits.com","unit":"platforms","value":2},{"claim_id":"claim-005","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-18","platform_support":["openai"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"good","subject":"Audits.com","unit":"platforms","value":1},{"claim_id":"claim-006","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-18","platform_support":["anthropic","perplexity"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"mixed","subject":"Audits.com","unit":"platforms","value":2},{"claim_id":"claim-007","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-18","platform_support":["deepseek","kimi"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"uncertain","subject":"Audits.com","unit":"platforms","value":2}],"content_scope":"aggregated facts, computed metrics, and retrieval summaries","entities":[{"average_rank":5.5,"best_rank":4,"entity_id":"entity-001","entity_type":"company","final_rank":6,"name":"Audits.com","platform_mentions":2,"platform_share":0.2857142857142857}],"identity":{"dataset_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/datasets/ai-search-audits-market-intelligence/executive-board-reporting/audits-com.json","page_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/ai-search-audits-market-intelligence/executive-board-reporting/audits-com","report_type":"fit_review","study_id":"AIMCI-STUDY-C9A51D6A7A68","title":"Audits.com for AI Search Audit Services for Executive and Board Reporting: AI Consensus Fit Review"},"limitations":["Use the run researchdate as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.","All included platforms evaluated fit, but platformmentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.","Do not resolve conflicting product names, pricing, or capabilities by guessing; describe the conflict and tell buyers what to verify.","The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.","Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations; do not describe company claims as independently verified.","Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date; disclose this as a methodology limitation.","The deterministic identity audit contains qualification notes that must be disclosed where relevant.","Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts."],"methodology":{"fit_rating_contract":["strong","good","mixed","weak","uncertain"],"included_valid_platform_count":7,"maximum_finalists":10,"minimum_mentions":2,"name":"AI Marketing Consensus Index cross-platform AI consensus analysis","platforms_included":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"platforms_queried":["openai","anthropic","deepseek","grok","perplexity","kimi","google"],"stages":["ranking_discovery","fit_assessment","normalization","editorial_synthesis"],"version":"alias-table-1"},"provenance":{"generated_at":"2026-09-18 13:51:16.508329+00","research_date":"2026-09-18","source_snapshot_sha256":"8e49089a8ea6356b432c9436497d001bb9059afd17b48d99384990fabf33e6af","verification_scope":"public_verification"},"ranking":{"candidates_evaluated":45,"qualified_finalists":6,"ranking_unit":"Audit company, audit service, or advisory provider"},"schema_version":4,"summary":"Audits.com is a qualified fit for AI Search Audit Services for Executive and Board Reporting, but with material diligence conditions. Two of seven platforms named Audits.com during the ranking stage — grok and perplexity — giving it a 28.6% share of included platform responses, an average listed rank of 5.5, and a best listed rank of 4. The strongest reason to consider it is that its AI & LLM SEO Audits service explicitly targets board-level clarity, quantified AI search exposure, share-of-voice monitoring, and leadership education. The main limitation is transparency: no public pricing, no…","target_buyer":"Executives and board-facing teams needing concise AI search risk, opportunity, and competitive reporting","topic":{"base_category":"AI search audits and market intelligence","category_criteria":["Recommendation share","competitive position","citation share","source intelligence","historical context where available","material risks","and prioritized strategic opportunities"],"geography":"United States","slug":"best-ai-search-audit-services-for-executive-and-board-reporting","title":"Best AI Search Audit Services for Executive and Board Reporting","use_case":"AI Search Audit Services for Executive and Board Reporting"}}