{"citations":{"source_mix":{"company_owned":27,"independent":9,"unclear":1},"sources_referenced_by_questions":0,"support_mix":{"direct":30,"partial":5},"total_sources":37,"unique_domain_count":16},"claims":[{"claim_id":"claim-001","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"platforms_analyzed","qualifier":"valid included platform responses","subject":"Best AI Citation Services for Building Third-Party Authority","unit":"platforms","value":7},{"claim_id":"claim-002","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["anthropic","kimi"],"predicate":"final_consensus_rank","qualifier":"AI Citation Services for Building Third-Party Authority","subject":"opositive","unit":"rank","value":6},{"claim_id":"claim-003","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["anthropic","kimi"],"predicate":"platform_mentions","qualifier":"out of 7","subject":"opositive","unit":"platforms","value":2},{"claim_id":"claim-004","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["google"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"strong","subject":"opositive","unit":"platforms","value":1},{"claim_id":"claim-005","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["openai","anthropic","kimi"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"good","subject":"opositive","unit":"platforms","value":3},{"claim_id":"claim-006","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["perplexity"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"mixed","subject":"opositive","unit":"platforms","value":1},{"claim_id":"claim-007","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["grok"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"weak","subject":"opositive","unit":"platforms","value":1},{"claim_id":"claim-008","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["deepseek"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"uncertain","subject":"opositive","unit":"platforms","value":1}],"content_scope":"aggregated facts, computed metrics, and retrieval summaries","entities":[{"average_rank":5.5,"best_rank":5,"entity_id":"entity-001","entity_type":"company","final_rank":6,"name":"opositive","platform_mentions":2,"platform_share":0.2857142857142857}],"identity":{"dataset_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/datasets/ai-citation-authority-building/third-party-authority/opositive.json","page_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/ai-citation-authority-building/third-party-authority/opositive","report_type":"fit_review","study_id":"AIMCI-STUDY-9ED70911CDDE","title":"opositive for AI Citation Services for Building Third-Party Authority: AI Consensus Fit Review"},"limitations":["Use the run researchdate as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.","All included platforms evaluated fit, but platformmentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.","Do not resolve conflicting product names, pricing, or capabilities by guessing; describe the conflict and tell buyers what to verify.","The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.","Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations; do not describe company claims as independently verified.","Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date; disclose this as a methodology limitation.","Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts."],"methodology":{"fit_rating_contract":["strong","good","mixed","weak","uncertain"],"included_valid_platform_count":7,"maximum_finalists":10,"minimum_mentions":2,"name":"AI Marketing Consensus Index cross-platform AI consensus analysis","platforms_included":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"platforms_queried":["openai","anthropic","deepseek","grok","perplexity","kimi","google"],"stages":["ranking_discovery","fit_assessment","normalization","editorial_synthesis"],"version":"alias-table-1"},"provenance":{"generated_at":"2026-09-17 14:58:05.713403+00","research_date":"2026-09-17","source_snapshot_sha256":"9c0744b791e2ae139ced06d2a32602abb1428a76f69751a9bb4763a64513850c","verification_scope":"public_verification"},"ranking":{"candidates_evaluated":50,"qualified_finalists":7,"ranking_unit":"Software, service, or advisory solution provider"},"schema_version":4,"summary":"opositive is a good fit, with material verification requirements, for companies that want an agency-led program to identify and improve third-party sources that AI answers cite. Two of the seven platforms named opositive during ranking discovery (anthropic, kimi), giving it a 28.6% share of included platform responses, an average listed rank of 5.5, and a best listed rank of 5. The strongest reason to consider it is its Full Citation Building Service, which maps category-specific threads, listicles, review sites, and publications and then executes outreach, digital PR, community, review, and…","target_buyer":"Companies that need credible third-party sources to corroborate their authority in AI search results","topic":{"base_category":"AI citation and authority building","category_criteria":["Identify which independent publishers","review sites","industry resources","communities","directories","and other third-party sources appear in the citation architecture of its category and develop a strategy for improving credible third-party coverage"],"geography":"United States","slug":"best-ai-citation-services-for-building-third-party-authority","title":"Best AI Citation Services for Building Third-Party Authority","use_case":"AI Citation Services for Building Third-Party Authority"}}