{"citations":{"source_mix":{"company_owned":22,"independent":6,"unclear":0},"sources_referenced_by_questions":0,"support_mix":{"direct":24,"partial":2},"total_sources":28,"unique_domain_count":11},"claims":[{"claim_id":"claim-001","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"platforms_analyzed","qualifier":"valid included platform responses","subject":"Best AI Citation Platforms for Historical Citation Tracking","unit":"platforms","value":7},{"claim_id":"claim-002","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["anthropic","kimi"],"predicate":"final_consensus_rank","qualifier":"AI Citation Platforms for Historical Citation Tracking","subject":"Indexly","unit":"rank","value":5},{"claim_id":"claim-003","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["anthropic","kimi"],"predicate":"platform_mentions","qualifier":"out of 7","subject":"Indexly","unit":"platforms","value":2},{"claim_id":"claim-004","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["grok"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"strong","subject":"Indexly","unit":"platforms","value":1},{"claim_id":"claim-005","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["anthropic","google"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"good","subject":"Indexly","unit":"platforms","value":2},{"claim_id":"claim-006","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"mixed","subject":"Indexly","unit":"platforms","value":2},{"claim_id":"claim-007","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["deepseek","kimi"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"uncertain","subject":"Indexly","unit":"platforms","value":2}],"content_scope":"aggregated facts, computed metrics, and retrieval summaries","entities":[{"average_rank":1.5,"best_rank":1,"entity_id":"entity-001","entity_type":"company","final_rank":5,"name":"Indexly","platform_mentions":2,"platform_share":0.2857142857142857}],"identity":{"dataset_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/datasets/ai-citation-authority-building/historical-citation-tracking/indexly.json","page_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/ai-citation-authority-building/historical-citation-tracking/indexly","report_type":"fit_review","study_id":"AIMCI-STUDY-CA05E4217BEB","title":"Indexly for AI Citation Platforms for Historical Citation Tracking: AI Consensus Fit Review"},"limitations":["Use the run researchdate as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.","All included platforms evaluated fit, but platformmentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.","Do not resolve conflicting product names, pricing, or capabilities by guessing; describe the conflict and tell buyers what to verify.","The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.","Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations; do not describe company claims as independently verified.","Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date; disclose this as a methodology limitation.","Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts."],"methodology":{"fit_rating_contract":["strong","good","mixed","weak","uncertain"],"included_valid_platform_count":7,"maximum_finalists":10,"minimum_mentions":2,"name":"AI Marketing Consensus Index cross-platform AI consensus analysis","platforms_included":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"platforms_queried":["openai","anthropic","deepseek","grok","perplexity","kimi","google"],"stages":["ranking_discovery","fit_assessment","normalization","editorial_synthesis"],"version":"alias-table-1"},"provenance":{"generated_at":"2026-09-17 17:50:06.293389+00","research_date":"2026-09-17","source_snapshot_sha256":"1e2b229f31befaccc1c282fd4b4df9a321e6170e61db63ff5508a9c9a4f546dd","verification_scope":"public_verification"},"ranking":{"candidates_evaluated":40,"qualified_finalists":7,"ranking_unit":"Software platform or research platform"},"schema_version":4,"summary":"Indexly is a mixed-to-good fit for AI Citation Platforms for Historical Citation Tracking. Two of the seven included platforms named Indexly during the ranking stage — Anthropic (rank 1) and Kimi (rank 2) — giving it a 28.6% share of included platform responses and an average listed rank of 1.5. The strongest reason to consider it is its advertised combination of daily citation counts per URL by model, prompt-level trend history, competitor citation-gap analysis, and company-stated indefinite historical retention at publicly listed prices starting at $99/month. The main limitation is that…","target_buyer":"Companies seeking AI Citation Platforms for Historical Citation Tracking across AI search, generative-answer, and recommendation platforms","topic":{"base_category":"AI citation and authority building","category_criteria":["Historical domain and URL citations","prompt-level trends","competitor movement","source gains and losses","citation architecture changes","and preserved research snapshots rather than only current-state reporting"],"geography":"United States","slug":"best-ai-citation-platforms-for-historical-citation-tracking","title":"Best AI Citation Platforms for Historical Citation Tracking","use_case":"AI Citation Platforms for Historical Citation Tracking"}}