{"citations":{"source_mix":{"company_owned":16,"independent":23,"unclear":0},"sources_referenced_by_questions":0,"support_mix":{"direct":14,"partial":24},"total_sources":39,"unique_domain_count":26},"claims":[{"claim_id":"claim-001","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"platforms_analyzed","qualifier":"valid included platform responses","subject":"Best AI Citation Tools for Competitor Source-Gap Analysis","unit":"platforms","value":6},{"claim_id":"claim-002","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","grok","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"final_consensus_rank","qualifier":"AI Citation Tools for Competitor Source-Gap Analysis","subject":"Profound","unit":"rank","value":1},{"claim_id":"claim-003","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","grok","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"platform_mentions","qualifier":"out of 6","subject":"Profound","unit":"platforms","value":5},{"claim_id":"claim-004","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["openai","anthropic","deepseek","grok","perplexity"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"good","subject":"Profound","unit":"platforms","value":5},{"claim_id":"claim-005","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-17","platform_support":["kimi"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"uncertain","subject":"Profound","unit":"platforms","value":1}],"content_scope":"aggregated facts, computed metrics, and retrieval summaries","entities":[{"average_rank":1.8,"best_rank":1,"entity_id":"entity-001","entity_type":"company","final_rank":1,"name":"Profound","platform_mentions":5,"platform_share":0.8333333333333334}],"identity":{"dataset_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/datasets/ai-citation-authority-building/competitor-source-gap-analysis/profound.json","page_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/ai-citation-authority-building/competitor-source-gap-analysis/profound","report_type":"fit_review","study_id":"AIMCI-STUDY-F8A35470B223","title":"Profound for AI Citation Tools for Competitor Source-Gap Analysis: AI Consensus Fit Review"},"limitations":["Use the run researchdate as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.","All included platforms evaluated fit, but platformmentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.","Do not resolve conflicting product names, pricing, or capabilities by guessing; describe the conflict and tell buyers what to verify.","The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.","Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date; disclose this as a methodology limitation.","The deterministic identity audit contains qualification notes that must be disclosed where relevant.","Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts."],"methodology":{"fit_rating_contract":["strong","good","mixed","weak","uncertain"],"included_valid_platform_count":6,"maximum_finalists":10,"minimum_mentions":2,"name":"AI Marketing Consensus Index cross-platform AI consensus analysis","platforms_included":["anthropic","deepseek","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"platforms_queried":["openai","anthropic","deepseek","grok","perplexity","kimi","google"],"stages":["ranking_discovery","fit_assessment","normalization","editorial_synthesis"],"version":"alias-table-1"},"provenance":{"generated_at":"2026-09-17 15:58:52.801644+00","research_date":"2026-09-17","source_snapshot_sha256":"1bbf75d9be2ff063ba5860613b5893d59e048842a016bf09e687262ace8cafe1","verification_scope":"public_verification"},"ranking":{"candidates_evaluated":27,"qualified_finalists":9,"ranking_unit":"Software, service, or advisory solution provider"},"schema_version":4,"summary":"Profound is a good fit for AI Citation Tools for Competitor Source-Gap Analysis, with material caveats. Five of the six platforms that produced fit research named Profound during ranking discovery — anthropic, deepseek, grok, openai, and perplexity — and five of those six rated it \"good,\" while kimi rated it \"uncertain\" over an unresolved domain-identity conflict. The strongest reason to consider it is its citation-analysis layer: source-level citation tracking, competitor citation-share comparison, and automatic source categorization map directly onto competitor source-gap work (, -10, ).…","target_buyer":"Brands seeking AI Citation Tools for Competitor Source-Gap Analysis across AI search, generative-answer, and recommendation platforms","topic":{"base_category":"AI citation and authority building","category_criteria":["Prompt-level citation data","competitor source comparisons","citation architecture mapping","source-gap identification","and guidance on which gaps are strategically meaningful"],"geography":"United States","slug":"best-ai-citation-tools-for-competitor-source-gap-analysis","title":"Best AI Citation Tools for Competitor Source-Gap Analysis","use_case":"AI Citation Tools for Competitor Source-Gap Analysis"}}