{"citations":{"source_mix":{"company_owned":16,"independent":0,"unclear":0},"sources_referenced_by_questions":0,"support_mix":{"direct":12,"partial":2},"total_sources":16,"unique_domain_count":7},"claims":[{"claim_id":"claim-001","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-16","platform_support":["deepseek","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"platforms_analyzed","qualifier":"valid included platform responses","subject":"Best AI Citation Building Agencies Overall","unit":"platforms","value":5},{"claim_id":"claim-002","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-16","platform_support":["kimi","perplexity"],"predicate":"final_consensus_rank","qualifier":"AI Citation Building Agencies","subject":"opositive","unit":"rank","value":1},{"claim_id":"claim-003","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-16","platform_support":["kimi","perplexity"],"predicate":"platform_mentions","qualifier":"out of 5","subject":"opositive","unit":"platforms","value":2},{"claim_id":"claim-004","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-16","platform_support":["openai","perplexity","kimi"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"good","subject":"opositive","unit":"platforms","value":3},{"claim_id":"claim-005","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-16","platform_support":["grok"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"mixed","subject":"opositive","unit":"platforms","value":1},{"claim_id":"claim-006","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-16","platform_support":["deepseek"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"uncertain","subject":"opositive","unit":"platforms","value":1}],"content_scope":"aggregated facts, computed metrics, and retrieval summaries","entities":[{"average_rank":2,"best_rank":1,"entity_id":"entity-001","entity_type":"company","final_rank":1,"name":"opositive","platform_mentions":2,"platform_share":0.4}],"identity":{"dataset_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/datasets/ai-citation-authority-building/agencies/opositive.json","page_url":"https://aimarketingconsensusindex.com/ai-citation-authority-building/agencies/opositive","report_type":"fit_review","study_id":"AIMCI-STUDY-577A9F78F2C2","title":"opositive for AI Citation Building Agencies: AI Consensus Fit Review"},"limitations":["Use the run researchdate as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.","All included platforms evaluated fit, but platformmentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.","Do not resolve conflicting product names, pricing, or capabilities by guessing; describe the conflict and tell buyers what to verify.","The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.","No deduplicated independent citation was supplied; clearly identify the evidence base as company-owned or platform-reported.","Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date; disclose this as a methodology limitation.","Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts."],"methodology":{"fit_rating_contract":["strong","good","mixed","weak","uncertain"],"included_valid_platform_count":5,"maximum_finalists":10,"minimum_mentions":2,"name":"AI Marketing Consensus Index cross-platform AI consensus analysis","platforms_included":["deepseek","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"platforms_queried":["openai","anthropic","deepseek","grok","perplexity","kimi","google"],"stages":["ranking_discovery","fit_assessment","normalization","editorial_synthesis"],"version":"alias-table-1"},"provenance":{"generated_at":"2026-09-16 10:53:14.543735+00","research_date":"2026-09-16","source_snapshot_sha256":"f94cbc98338963d9aba088e1055408a616acff635e9f5b660653b870c3f2954c","verification_scope":"public_verification"},"ranking":{"candidates_evaluated":39,"qualified_finalists":3,"ranking_unit":"Agency or consulting partner"},"schema_version":4,"summary":"opositive is a good, but not fully verified, fit for companies seeking an agency to build AI citations. Two of the five platforms that evaluated fit named opositive during ranking discovery, and it finished first overall in the final ranking. Its strongest asset is a published service scope that maps directly to the buyer's workflow: citation audit, source prospecting, digital PR, entity and Wikidata work, and ongoing citation tracking. The main limitation is evidence quality. Every supplied citation is company-owned, no independent validation was located, and pricing, contract terms, and…","target_buyer":"Companies seeking AI Citation Building Agencies across AI search, generative-answer, and recommendation platforms","topic":{"base_category":"AI citation and authority building","category_criteria":["Analyze current citations","map the citation architecture surrounding its category","identify missing first-party and third-party authority sources","improve source eligibility","and measure changes over time"],"geography":"United States","slug":"best-ai-citation-building-agencies-overall","title":"Best AI Citation Building Agencies Overall","use_case":"AI Citation Building Agencies"}}